As a general rule of thumb, I've tried to avoid questioning the wisdom of my critics. I try to accept criticism as meant to be constructive feedback from engaged readers, and I appreciate it whenever anyone takes the time and goes to the trouble of expressing their thoughts about my work, both positive and negative. However, there are exceptions to every rule. When James L. "Jimmy B." Bradbury recently posted a rather inflammatory comment in response to my article on Brian Bell and the bizarre death of Kendrick Johnson, I decided the gravity of his very serious accusation warranted and even mandated a rebuttal. Mr. Bradbury strongly implied that I became an accessory after the fact in a murder when he wrote: Dear John, Either you haven’t done your homework or you have some personal interest in helping cover up this murder. Unless you’re just a complete moron you have to give some credence to the very suspicious happenings surrounding the videos, the two autopsy’s [SIC], the fact that the Bell brothers refuse to speak to investigators, the missing body parts, the police incompetence in gathering the physical evidence and all the other elements involved. This is a real mystery and that’s why the government is investigating. It took the Police 3 month to close the case, Why is it that the Federal Government has already taken 16 months, If nothing was wrong they would have closed their investigation long ago. Nice try, Jimmy B. That is a very powerful accusation, indeed. It is my intent to go well beyond merely responding to"Mr. B.'s" somewhat insidious accusations … [Read more...]