What makes an atheist happy? In the case of biology professor P. Z. Myers, the answer to that question shouldn't be all that difficult to discern, especially considering the fact he wrote a book titled The Happy Atheist. Though I don't know Professor Myers, should we ever meet, I suspect it is possible we could consider each other a friend, in spite of our vast difference in opinion about certain mutual topics of interest. One reason I think it's possible is because it seems that we share a few things in common. Also, I respect his honesty. For example, I agreed with him completely when he wrote that saying "abiogenesis is not evolution" is a cop-out and commend Professor Myers for his intellectual courage to admit it. After all, more than once I have asserted that life cannot evolve until it exists myself. The logical foundation for making the connection between life and its origin would seem to be inarguable -- but that doesn't keep some people from wanting to argue about it. Several of my atheist friends have tried to rebut the "Big Picture" argument presented in my book Counterargument for God by saying the ability for a living organism to change and the origin of life are two completely separate processes as unrelated as gravity and germ theories, which is just plain silly to even suggest. The hypothesis called abiogenesis might be an issue for chemistry and the theory of evolution a philosophical interest in biology, but biological organisms are created by chemical reactions forming complex structures. That little fact is undeniable. Going … [Read more...]
Fossilized rabbits in the Precambrian
In his book The God Delusion, prominent atheist Richard Dawkins wrote, "As J. B. S. Haldane said when asked what evidence might contradict evolution, 'Fossil rabbits in the Precambrian.'" But how does Haldane's rather sarcastic and flippant remark translate into English? Well, consider that the Precambrian describes the geologic period of time between the origin of life and the Cambrian explosion. According to our experts in paleontology, this particular period of time during the Earth's development was dominated by single-celled organisms that descended via asexual reproduction from LUCA, an acronym referring to our Last Universal Common Ancestor, formed by a secular miracle of chemical reaction. So a fossil showing the presence of a more complex and modern product of sexual reproduction, such as a rabbit or a human, shouldn't be found in rocks formed long before that particular creature could have come into existence, according to these "rules" of evolution. When Darwin famously suggested that "monkeys make men", he could have claimed that protozoa make men, but his idea presented in The Origin of Species would have been harder to defend using comparative anatomy as the only weapon in Darwin's arsenal of evidence to argue in favor of common descent rather than common design. The idea that every living organism is related through common descent is the very heart and soul of Darwin's theory -- the belief that simple organisms can gradually evolve to become more complex, given the vagaries of time, through variety created by descent with modification via … [Read more...]
