In the toxic climate of misandry fomented by the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, the only evidence you need to see to illustrate the disgusting hypocrisy of the Democratic Party is Senator Bob Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey. Facebook just popped up a video on screen of that human-pig hybrid creature without warning, and I didn't have a barf bag handy. As that human piece of excrement droned on about Kavanaugh's confirmation coming "by any means necessary" and some nonsense about "get out of jail free cards", I got up and quickly walked away from my laptop, lest I succumb to the temptation to smash that expensive piece of equipment into a million pieces. Despicable Bob Menendez Did I just hear my headphones right? Did those unbelievably hypocritical words really come out of the mouth of that jackass? How can anyone sit in that room and know what I know about Bob Menendez, and not tell him to sit down and shut up before his sexual perversions and corruption became a topic on social media? If you look up the word irony in the dictionary, it will refer you to the word "scumbag" and show you a picture of Bob Menendez. It's bad enough if I think of you as beneath contempt, and difficult to fathom anyone beneath Bob Menendez in terms of sleaze. Let me tell you a little bit about "Bob" that the voters of New Jersey don't seem to mind. Sure, he was given a trial and found not guilty by the jury of corruption charges for taking bribes from Dr. Salomon Melgen, but he was not found innocent of traveling to the Dominican Republic specifically for the purposes of … [Read more...]
The lame stream media
Unless you've been stranded on a desert island like Tom Hanks in the movie Castaway, you've heard of Christine Blasey Ford, by far the most credible (and incredible) witness to swear under oath about extremely serious sexual allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, dating back from when he was in high school more than thirty-five years ago. I deliberately chose the adverb "extremely" to modify the phrase "serious sexual allegations" because I honestly believe that anyone guilty of rape or attempted rape should be locked in jail and the key thrown away. Castration isn't off the table, either. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind, right? The only problem with my draconian approach to solving rape is that false accusations must risk equal consequences. In other words, Brett Kavanaugh has been publicly and salaciously accused of attempted rape and gang rape. There is no way to sugarcoat the accusations to make them more palatable. Indeed, Judge Kavanaugh has had his name slandered and he has been metaphorically lynched by the lame stream media for the vilest of reasons, the assumption that he will become the pivotal vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, the infamous Supreme Court decision to legalize abortion. Furthermore, if you spend most of your time with your head buried in sand or live under a rock, you may not have heard of Deborah Ramirez or Julie Swetnick, either. You should know their names. It's actually very important that we never forget these women, but not for reasons or in the way they would prefer to be remembered. They need to be ashamed of what they've done, … [Read more...]
Dishonest book reviews
Unless these are the first words I've written that you've ever read, you're probably aware of the fact I've been a rather unabashed critic of Darwinian theory as extrapolated to explain the origin of new species. The results of Gregor Mendel's genetic experiments, muddled together with atheist philosophy, offers a superficial and completely inadequate alternative to a supernatural Creator, yet the high priests of Darwin eagerly wait for the first opportunity to make a blood sacrifice of those deemed heretics. Writing a book and getting it published is actually rather easy in the modern world of ebooks and self-publishing. However, writing a book worth reading is another matter entirely. I know this, because after letting them go "cold" in my memory I re-read my first two Mercer novels and promptly pulled them off the market in order to improve them. I'm a tough, but fair critic. The plots won't be changed significantly, but I know I can do a better job of telling the story than I did when I first started writing eight years ago. My wife and I have become much better editors over time. Recently I stumbled across this internet post by Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, who made a worrisome claim about a fellow academic named Herman Mays. Dr. Jeanson recently wrote a book called Replacing Darwin, which I have not had the opportunity to read. In this article where Dr. Mays was mentioned, Dr. Jeanson wrote, Dr. Mays asserted that I’m scientifically incompetent to make the claims that I do in Replacing Darwin. He also claimed that my book is full of errors and omissions. … [Read more...]
The gods of atheism
Most atheists will claim they don't believe in gods, but they're wrong. They simply don't recognize their gods as being gods because they lack the traditional names like Jesus, Yahweh, or Allah. The gods of atheism (and science) are Time and Luck. Yeah, I know--not all scientists are atheists, but most atheists want to think of themselves as intellectuals and scientists, though. Consider the following paragraph found in an article from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, titled "Here's what happened when scientists gave octopuses ecstasy:" They (researchers from Johns Hopkins University) noted that octopuses are separated from humans by more than 500 million years of evolution and have brains that are more similar to those of snails. However, with MDMA, they were able to exhibit some of the same actions of people. Now if you're like me a few questions might have just popped into your head, such as: how would an octopus and a human being "share" a common ancestor? The relationship between "ancestor" and "descendant" is normally defined by sexual reproduction between two members of the same species. The two "species" in question have quite a few very obvious morphological differences, and the only person who apparently ever considered the quantitative differences between two distinctly different but allegedly related species seems to have been philosopher David Berlinski. Because cows and whales allegedly share a common, land-based mammal ancestor that hypothetically lived approximately 160 million years ago and was only about the size of a modern shrew, we … [Read more...]
GK-PID and the origin of species
Even though most biologists accept Darwin’s theory of natural selection as the explanation for how modern species came to exist, the mystery remains of how complex multicellular plants and animals evolved from far simpler single-celled organisms that rely on asexual reproduction to perpetuate their species. The offspring of single-celled organisms have the genes and DNA from only one parent, requiring no fusion of gametes or changes in the number of chromosomes. Single-celled organisms are independent creatures. The average human body contains anywhere between 60 and 90 trillion cells that cooperate and work in collaboration to function as bones, organs, and tissue. The biological processes and rules that governs the creation of DNA from two parent organisms are far more complex and require the development of new protein structures which single-celled organism neither have nor need and therefore should not be produced by asexual reproduction. However, recent research and experiments have suggested a protein structure named GK-PID facilitated evolution from ancient, ancestral single-celled organisms into more complex and modern creatures and humans. Christian beliefs regarding the origin of life vary from young earth creationism with an earth only 6,000 years old to old earth creationism, which finds no conflict between the Big Bang theory as the explanation for the origin of the universe and Genesis 1:3, which reads, “And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.” Christians may also believe that intelligent design or even theistic evolution best describes how … [Read more...]
