Willful ignorance

 A couple of years ago, I faced the rather formidable challenge of engaging in public debate against Ed Buckner, former president of American Atheists. Ed was very experienced in that sort of thing; it was my first and remains as of today, the only formal debate I've ever had in my life. Therefore, my work was certainly cut out for me. Fortunately for me, video existed on You Tube showing Ed present his best arguments while debating a Muslim scholar in the U.K. named Hamza Andreas Tzortzis. So I took copious notes, seizing upon the opportunity to anticipate Ed's best shots. In fairness, Ed also should have been able to anticipate my best shots coming, if he'd bothered to read some of my work as the Atlanta Creationism Examiner. In my opening remarks, I enumerated the seven points that Ed made that were the foundation his best arguments for atheism and then eviscerated them, point-by-point. I sort of expected that once the logical flaws in Ed's argument were systematically exposed and shredded before he'd ever opened his mouth, we would then be able to spend the remainder of our time arguing about points about the science that has now officially become the crux of my Counterargument for God. Because I knew Ed to be quite an intelligent man, I will now confess that I was expecting the alleged "freethinker" would be a little bit more open-minded. I foolishly assumed that Ed would be able to defend his own beliefs, rather than simply attacking what he supposed to be mine with every opportunity.Sadly, Ed disappointed me. Also in my opening … [Read more...]

Runaway Rusty

We decided to add just a couple of stories to my book Always a Next One. We replaced the preview chapter of Coastal Empire at the back of the book with a little more content while we were adding pictures of the dogs to the e-book version. These two additional stories are dedicated to Jennie Attaway, for inspiring me to write them. This one is called Runaway Rusty... Usually, we humans decide to adopt a dog. But sometimes, it works the other way around. Rusty had experienced a rough life before he came to our house for rescue and rehabilitation. After spending several weeks camped at my wife’s feet, he picked up on what life was like for the rest of our pack. When it came time for his adoption, Rusty had obviously developed his own ideas about where his perfect forever home might be. “Rusty was returned again,” Lisa said. “What did he do this time?” I asked, not terribly surprised. “The woman who adopted him complained that he kept running away,” Lisa said. “She said every time she walked out the front door, he’d make a run for it. She’s tired of chasing him all over her neighborhood.” “Rusty?” I asked incredulously. That didn’t sound like him at all. “When will you bring him back here?” “When I go to the shelter on Thursday.” And so it was settled. It wasn’t Rusty’s first time through our revolving door. The older but beautiful black-and-tan collie had fostered with us more than once since his original owner surrendered him back the shelter. The woman who had adopted Rusty from the shelter as a puppy returned him after six years with … [Read more...]

The dishonesty of atheism

Though I'm not a public figure by any stretch of the imagination, I've learned that it's a good idea to occasionally search the internet for my name, to see if anything posted out there was directed specifically towards me. It isn't a question of vanity as much as not wanting to demonstrate bad manners by ignoring a serious attempt to communicate with me. My most recent search turned up this article by author Dianna Narciso that was originally published over two years ago. She had responded to something I wrote during my time spent as the Atlanta Creationism Examiner. For whatever reason, her article never appeared in the first few pages of search results before now. Oh well. Better late than never, I guess... Ms. Narciso asserted that she is not a close-minded freethinker. We'll see. I don't get very far into her article before Ms. Narciso writes, "Mr. Leonard, I am very sorry to disappoint you. But you do, indeed, believe what you believe without rational thought." Really! That seems an incredibly presumptuous thing to say. What sources of information gave her such great insight? On what basis was her opinion formed? Without reading my books, or more than one article I've written, how on earth can Ms. Narciso possibly know what I believe? More importantly, does she even have a clue as to why I believe what I believe? Has she read Divine Evolution? If Ms. Narciso is actually interested in learning the science necessary to present a coherent argument for her atheism, the end notes of my book Counterargument for God might prove quite helpful. My … [Read more...]

The problem with speciation theory

Speciation is the scientific theory attempting to identify the biological mechanisms by which a single ancestral species of organism differentiates, or "evolves", into more than one descendant species. The term "macro evolution" is often substituted inappropriately for speciation theory, creating the false impression that speciation is nothing more than a logical extrapolation of Darwin's theory of natural selection. But it isn't. As I wrote in my book Counterargument for God, either two members of the same ancestor species eventually spawn offspring of a new species, or members of two different species produce a fertile hybrid species. There doesn't really seem to be a viable third alternative, at least not one that doesn't involve creation by some form of supernatural intelligence. In an effort to clarify my understanding of how speciation theory supposedly worked, I wrote an open letter to biologist Dr. Jerry Coyne, author of the book Why Evolution is True. Apparently, Dr. Coyne couldn't find time to respond. However, his fellow biologist, Dr. Benoit LeBlanc, was kind enough to answer my questions. Dr. LeBlanc confirmed that my "basic understanding of the [speciation] process was sound", but suggested the reason my conclusions were all wrong because I simply don't know enough about biology. No offense intended, he said. None taken, Dr. LeBlanc. But I am still confused. In my analysis of Dr. Coyne's work previously deemed sound, I noted he speculated that speciation only seemed possible when a small breeding population comprised of members of a … [Read more...]

Animal cruelty, for the sake of dental implants, at Georgia Regents University

While we were visiting Miami for the Readers' Favorite book awards ceremony, my friend Claire Stanton Wells sent me a link to this article about Georgia Regents University and unnecessary, painful dental experiments being performed on dogs under the guise of scientific research. Quite frankly, the story got my blood boiling. It shouldn't be very difficult to guess which side I will naturally take in this controversy -- the side of the dog, of course. Otherwise, I should be forced to give back the gold medal I just received for my book Always a Next One: true stories of dog fostering. I simply cannot and will not tolerate the idea of dogs or cats being tortured or  allowed to suffer needlessly, especially not here in my home state. The salient facts in the article were quite clear--dogs have been used for the purposes of experimental dental surgery, and then put to death for a piece of their jaw. For those of us dedicated to the cause of animal rescue, this needless and barbaric practice is totally unacceptable. It flies in the face of everything rescue groups stand for. Life is a precious gift, not to be squandered for frivolous reasons. These poor animals deserve better. Humane advocate Nathan Winograd has demonstrated that given time, no-kill shelters will work. Man's best friend should never put to sleep for lack of space, or the want of a good home. Only incurably sick animals, or those suffering from severe injury that cannot be healed and rehabilitated should ever be humanely euthanized. Aggressive spay-and-neuter or "SNAP" programs have … [Read more...]