Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution

Once upon a time, I wrote online for Examiner.com as the Atlanta Creationism Examiner. Now that all the links to my work have been disabled and can no longer be found on their website, I've decided to republish some of the better material here on my own website, since I wrote it and own the content of the article. The title of the article has not been changed. The links in the originally published post have been deleted, however, since most of them were no longer functional. I think it's information worth sharing again... They say you can’t judge a good book by its cover.  Apparently you can’t always tell from the title, either.  Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution (edited by Paul S. Moorhead and Martin M. Kaplan) didn’t look like riveting material on first glance. Once I started reading, it proved difficult to put down. The premise for the book was rather interesting.  In the mid 1960s, four mathematicians were attending a friendly picnic hosted by Kaplan and a fellow biologist.  During their lunch a rather spirited discussion of evolution theory spontaneously erupted. The biologists proposed a more formally organized showdown with the four mathematicians at a later date.  After negotiating their reprieve, they recruited a pair of prominent advocates of evolution theory: Sir Peter Medawar and Dr. Ernst Mayr. Medawar chaired the symposium. If the reader wonders how the meeting went, perhaps biologist Kaplan’s rather peevish preface gives some indication.  He mischievously quoted a pair of mathematicians (speaking ill … [Read more...]

Truth

Quid est veritas? Perhaps the most provocative question of all time translates from Latin into English to query, "What is truth?" According to John 18:38, Pontius Pilate asked this of Jesus prior to his crucifixion. Some people believe that Jesus was only a man. Others believe Jesus never even existed. And there are also people like me believe the story told in the Gospel of John is basically accurate, and that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah and Son of God. Now I can confess that I believe the previous statement is true, but I can't claim to know it is true. Get the difference? Not everyone believes that Shakespeare wrote his own plays. A movie called Anonymous asserted that Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, wrote and published those famous plays like Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet using the pseudonym of William Shakespeare. Francis Bacon and Christopher Marlowe have also been credited with the work of William Shakespeare, but there is no way to conclusively prove beyond all reasonable doubt  that William Shakespeare did not write his own material. We might even be able to back up our speculation with tantalizing bits of evidence, but we cannot establish something as a fact when we don't have proof. However, every person on Earth believes they possess absolute knowledge when in fact, we all have beliefs based on reasonable assumptions. Beliefs that are easily confused and twisted to the point where something probably real, or true has been accepted as a false, or a forgery...for example, the Shroud of Turin. Quid est veritas? What is truth? Is the … [Read more...]

The courage of Devon Gales

Sympathy is defined as feeling sorrow for the misfortunes of someone else. Empathy means you can literally understand, or at least to some degree share their experience. This post will be very short and to the point, because I can only type with one hand at the moment. My left arm is temporarily useless. I had elbow surgery this morning, and my anesthesiologist put a nerve block on my dominant arm. Probably until tomorrow, I won't  be able to feel anything or use my left hand, a very strange experience that once again has reminded me of Devon Gales. Please forgive any typos or unclear thoughts expressed by my currently drug-impaired brain. The loss of use of my arm is a very strange sensation, yet in my case it will be temporary. When this wears off I expect to welcome pain as the indicator my body wants to heal itself and didn't enjoy this morning's experience. My arm may be hurting right now, but I don't care. In case you forgot or didn't know, wide receiver Devon Gales was paralyzed last year while blocking on a kickoff return during a game between the Southern University Jaguars and the University of Georgia Bulldogs, in Sanford Stadium. However, for young Mr. Gales, full recovery will take much, much longer, He's made tremendous progress that has been reported in the news, but there is a long way to go for a complete recovery, and the restoration of full use of his extremities. Usually when I write about a tragedy, typically a request that people contribute financially will accompany my shameless attempt to pull on your heart strings. Perhaps the … [Read more...]

Chihuly at Atlanta Botanical Gardens

Sometimes I can feel like a complete idiot...like, for example, yesterday. The occasion was my first visit to the Atlanta Botanical Gardens. After nearly thirty years of living in this city, as many times as we've visited Stone Mountain, the Atlanta Zoo, Turner Field, even tourist "attractions" like the World of Coca-Cola and Underground Atlanta, I finally visited to the Atlanta Botanical Garden. What on earth took me so long? This has to be the best-kept secret in the city. And the really sad thing was, I knew the Garden existed years ago, when Neil Young mentioned touring it during a concert at Chastain Park, piquing my curiosity when he claimed the catwalk was haunted. "What's up with that?" Neil asked the crowd. Sorry, Mr. Young, but I forgot to ask somebody last night, so I still couldn't tell you. But his question did make me curious. Yet it took my wife expressing keen interest in a special exhibit of glass blown pieces by world-renowned artist Dale Chihuly to get me to visit, and now I sincerely regret all the other opportunities I've missed over the years. The Atlanta Botanical Garden is breathtaking to visit, and during the Chihuly exhibit (which ends October 30th) is nothing short of spectacular, especially at night. We arrived early enough for the "night" session to enjoy the gardens in daylight...                     but at night, the Garden becomes magical. The Chihuly exhibit will remain until October 30th. If you miss it, don't blame me. To me, the bottom left photo looks like … [Read more...]

Tom Tozer reviews Bart Ehrman’s book Jesus Before the Gospels, Part 4

[This is the final installment of a four-part series of articles written by Tom Tozer that reviews Bart Ehrman’s book Jesus Before the Gospels.] See also: Tom's review, Part 1 Tom's review, Part 2 Tom's review, Part 3 And now, here is Part 4. Chapter 7: The Kaleidoscopic Memories of Jesus: John, Thomas and a Range of Others. Ehrman starts out Chapter 7 by asserting that Mark was “a collective memory” and says that now we're going to talk about the “other collective memories.” However, he hasn't demonstrated that Mark is anything less than the account of an eyewitness. He doesn't believe it is, but he hasn't established that. So this is not a promising start. He asserts that the Gospel of John – or “the memories contained” in it – “differ radically from Mark.” On the surface, there is something to this. John is elaborately theological. Mark is more like a police report. If John is a Persian rug, Mark is a grocery list. And yet, at the core of these two Gospels, for 2,000 years, Christians have found the same Jesus. Oddly enough. Now why that might be Ehrman doesn't bother to ask. The purpose of this chapter for Ehrman is “to show that there was not one remembered image of Jesus among his early followers, but “a kaleidoscopically varied set of images.” But how can Ehrman include Marcion, the Gospels of Judas, Thomas and Theodotus as “remembered images of his early followers”? He doesn't demonstrate that any of these authors had any connection to a witness to Jesus' life. In fact, that lack of connection is exactly what kept these documents out of … [Read more...]