The Time Bandits, a film by Monty Python's Terry Gilliam, is perhaps the underrated comedy in Hollywood history. Evil and Benson One of the film's most important characters was Evil, played with panache by the late, great David Warner, who uttered what instantly became my favorite line from the movie: "Oh Benson, dear Benson, you are so mercifully free from the ravages of intelligence." Naturally, Benson being Benson, and failing to realize it wasn't a compliment, thanked Evil for the brutal insult. The phrase implies contradiction, doesn't it? We humans normally think of intelligence as an asset, not a liability, and yet "ravages" means to lay waste by plundering or destroying. Naturally, the beauty of Evil's choice of words is the truth in them. However, when I think of "the ravages of intelligence" I don't normally have Benson in mind, it's this guy: economist Paul Krugman. It would be silly for me to claim that Krugman is totally free from the ravages of intelligence, because the man has been proclaimed an economics genius and awarded a Nobel Prize, which in theory is supposed to be a prestigious honor. In practice, the Nobel Prize has become something of a politically correct joke, but it does give the winner instant credibility. Mr. Krugman has leveraged that award into a pretty sweet gig as a New York Times columnist, where he continues to be wrong in most of his predictions. On the other hand, Mr. Krugman is on record as offering any number of stupid, even indefensible opinions to his devoted readers. In truth, I could make this article … [Read more...]
The implied beliefs of atheism
[AUTHOR'S NOTE: Hat tip to TC and Emily for serving as inspiration for this article.] Atheists typically don't like organized religion, and many will seize just about any excuse to attack the beliefs of theists. Only yesterday a friend of mine posted a political comment on social media that mentioned abortion, yet somehow an atheist lurking in the shadows managed to bring religion into the conversation by claiming the Bible doesn't condemn abortion. In my response I pointed out that Scripture doesn't mention nuclear war or space travel either, because those things also didn't exist when the Bible was written. Elective surgery by a medical doctor to kill an unborn child in the womb wasn't simply available when Jesus walked the Earth. 13 weeks into pregnancy His argument was weak, but my new atheist acquaintance was just getting warmed up. Next this particular religion critic boldly claimed the Bible was a work of fiction, which is an odd statement for an atheist to make. Most of my atheist friends realize the best strategy is to remain on offense and attack religion while carefully avoiding any knowledge claims they might have to defend. For example, most atheists will say something safe like "I believe the Bible is fiction" instead of "the Bible is fiction" because the former is merely stating an opinion, but the latter is a knowledge claim that will ultimately need to be defended with empirical evidence. Everyone is entitled to have an opinion, but not their own independent set of facts. And the fact of the matter is, the claim the Bible is a work of fiction … [Read more...]
Panspermia
The concept of panspermia was first introduced to me by National Lampoon in the form of a joke--one issue of the magazine contained a description of a new version of the video game Space Invaders in which players are encouraged to "knock down the invading sperm from space before they knock up your little sister." Well, I laughed. I don't apologize for my often bizarre sense of humor. In my opinion, one ought to be able to admit that the idea of extraterrestrial sperm coming from outer space to create life on Earth is pretty funny. What's even funnier is panspermia is actually a scientific hypothesis that mostly exists because of a mathematics problem, created by the foolish assumption of secular-minded scientists that creation can come to exist without a Creator. After DNA was discovered, calculations were performed to determine low long it would take "Nature" to produce a double helix without intelligent help. Even the most optimistic projections could not explain how life came to exist so quickly after the Earth was created (approximately 4 billion years ago). The same experts say that the earliest forms of life appeared on Earth 3.6 billion years ago, only 400 million years later. The mathematics problem associated with the origin of life on Earth stems from calculations of how long experts have estimated it would take for DNA to form by luck and random chance. The most optimistic estimates require a lot more time than four hundred million years. Because the universe is many billions of years older than Earth, by invoking panspermia and proclaiming the … [Read more...]
A monopoly on speech
If you aren't worried, you must not be paying attention. Of course, you could be a neo-liberal, and believe everyone except a heterosexual white Christian male has the right to speak freely. In that case, you'll probably think it's great if someone decides to "de-platform" this website under the premise that it's "hate speech" to state the obvious, which is to say that people born with an "Y" chromosome (formerly known as biological males) have significant physical advantages when engaged in athletic competitions against people without "X" chromosomes, a.k.a biological females. Or, if I really wanted to throw caution to the wind, I might even have the audacity to say that fetus is nothing more than a fancy word substituted for the phrase unborn baby to assuage the guilty consciences of millions who want the legal right to kill them. I know, I know...the word "fetus" is a technical, scientific term, and I'm using the vernacular of the unwashed, uneducated (and uber-religious) masses to describe the exact same thing. However, the point of this little diatribe isn't to rail specifically against transgender athletes or legal abortions, but to demand the freedom to criticize them without having to live in fear of retribution. The First Amendment guarantee of free speech does not require that a private business should have to provide services to customers they do not wish to serve. Because I supported the right of Colorado businessman Jack Phillips and his Masterpiece Cakeshop to refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding on religious grounds, I must also, albeit … [Read more...]
Every day reaches a new low
Social media becomes more problematic for me to use by the day. Liberals can say whatever the hell they want with absolutely no fear of censorship. Conservatives can't tell the truth without Facebook or Twitter slapping some half-assed "fact checking" claim that is usually a pathetic joke of biased interpretation passed off as truth by a lazy press corps. Politics cannot be avoided, but only half the conversation is being allowed. I've always used Facebook and liked the interface until I began to realize how intrusive their data mining has become. For example, somehow Mark Zuckerberg found out that I took a business trip to Ireland in 1998. Facebook wasn't launched until six years later, so I could not have posted photos of my trip or published my travel itinerary, not that I would be stupid enough to advertise to burglars when I'm not around to protect my home. I am 99.9999+ percent certain that I have never mentioned that little tidbit of information on Facebook. So, the question is, how did Facebook find out about my trip and mention it as one of the fun facts about me that others can learn without my intentional consent. Ah, but there's the rub, isn't it? To what have I consented, when I clicked "Agree" to their book-length terms of service agreement? I understood that the social media application was going to use information learned about me from my use of Facebook and the internet itself to help advertisers market products to me while I'm using their product. Again, information about my travel to Ireland can't even be on my own computer, because my laptop … [Read more...]
