Unkind and unloving Christians

Allegedly, The Ragamuffin Gospel author Brennan Manning once said, "The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips and walk out the door and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable." I'm coming up on the third anniversary of launching The God Conclusion Facebook page to call attention to the fact I wrote a book with the same name. My purpose of my book is to reach out to the people who read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins and thought it was a great book. I thought The God Delusion was a very well written book, but practically every word in it was wrong. Thus, my primary targets audience for the book are atheists. However, I thought Christians interested in arguing with atheists about the existential questions might also appreciate the last third of the book, which presents scientific evidence explained in a logical manner and could prove useful in a debate. I'll never give up on looking for new readers. In fact, I will cheerfully give away a free PDF, Kindle, or audio copy to just about anybody who asks (audiobooks are available in the US and UK only.) One person once asked for a copy that he intended to use to wipe his buttocks after eliminating his bowel waste, and I had to point out that the print books are not given away free and what he wanted to do with my book was an not advisable use of an electronic device. Atheists can be quite childish at times, but the attacks from people who claim to be fellow Christians do occasionally bother me. I've … [Read more...]

Wes Huff killed Goliath

If you’ve never heard of Wesley Huff before, don’t feel too bad. I’d never heard of him either, until a few weeks ago. Suddenly, he’s famous because of an impromptu debate he had on a podcast with Billy Carson, founder and CEO of a company called 4BiddenKnowledge and a self-proclaimed expert on “ancient texts and tablets, scriptures, papyrus, and cylinders.” Carson has complained in the past that Christian scholars have refused to debate him but all that changed when his good friend Mark Minard invited young Wesley Huff, a Canadian Bible scholar still working on his PhD on his podcast to debate Billy. Huff accepted the challenge to debate Carson with only 24 hours advance notice to prepare, but he didn’t need more time.  Huff didn’t merely defeat Billy Carson in their debate, he embarrassed him. In fairness, Carson later revealed he had not been feeling well and had been recently hospitalized with pneumonia, even coming near death. Perhaps in hindsight it would have been better had the debate been postponed until Billy felt better, although Billy has refused to debate Huff again now that he’s fully recovered.  Though the conversation went on for roughly two hours, the debate was probably over in the first ten minutes. Huff began by asking Carson a simple question to clarify their individual positions, asking Billy if he was referring to Codex Sinaiticus when he claimed the Sinai Bible did not contain any references to the crucifixion. Carson said yes, and then Huff promptly pulled his own personal copy of Codex Sinaiticus off his bookshelf. … [Read more...]

Honoring Jimmy Carter

Someone who reads my articles at American Thinker wrote an email asking for my thoughts on the subject of honor. Where should I begin? And what should I say? The dictionary defines honor as having a good reputation, or a showing of (usually) merited respect. Of course, the Bible tells us in the Old Testament that we should honor God and honor our father and mother, but 1 Peter 2:17 goes further and says we should honor everyone. Personally, I'm big on honoring the service of our military, police, firefighters, doctors, hospital workers, hospice workers, waiters and waitresses, and basically anyone else who serves the community--if someone is wearing a uniform, I always say thank you to them. During my youth I was taught to live by the adage if you can't say something nice about somebody, don't say anything at all. This presents a bit of a problem because Jimmy Carter recently died. We're both from Georgia, and I believe we should never speak ill of the dead. If I had to only write about his career as a politician, I wouldn't have anything to write. Jimmy Carter was our 39th President, and I vividly remember his brief tenure in the White House. All I can and will say about his presidency was that it wasn't brief enough. The word "malaise" perfectly describes my life as a teenager during the Carter years in the White House. As I began to research Carter's life, looking for some nice things to say about him, unfortunately I found more people with negative things to say about our late former president, some of which I didn't know or didn't remember, such … [Read more...]

Richard Dawkins versus the concept of sin

Sin is doing something wrong in the mind of God. Richard Dawkins apparently doesn't think sin exists. He once wrote, "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference." Is that true? Do good and evil not exist? Is sin only imaginary? What about stealing? What about having sex with someone else's wife or husband? What about murder? What about rape? Does wrong even exist in Dawkins's world? I confess I am a tad confused, but I don't think it's my fault. I think it's because Richard Dawkins tends to talk out of both sides of his mouth. Richard is famous for making sensational claims and writing books with provocative titles like The God Delusion. He also has the reputation for having this splendid scientific mind that he allegedly displayed while writing books such as The Selfish Gene, The Blind Watchmaker, and The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution, in which he wrote, "Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. The evidence for evolution is at least as strong as the evidence for the Holocaust, even allowing for eyewitnesses to the Holocaust. It is the plain truth that we are cousins of chimpanzee, somewhat more distant cousins of monkey, more distant cousins still of aardvarks and manatees, yet more distant cousins of bananas and turnips…continue the list as long as desired." According to Dawkins (paraphrased) … [Read more...]

Matthew and baby Jesus

Thirty five years ago in July, our son was born. We named him Matthew, which means "gift from God." In 1990, there were four babies born in our church congregation in short order. All of them were boys, and they were named Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The parents of these children, including my wife and me, had no idea the other parents were having boys or what they planned to name them. Even more amazing, the boys were born in "Gospel" order, which required Luke to be born prematurely. What are the odds that four babies would be born in the same congregation, and that they would be named Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and born in order, with no girls or boys with other names born in between? The math is quite complicated. Of course, if you knew the child would be male and had to be named either Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John, then the math can be relatively easy and simple enough. It's four factorial, or twenty-four different possible combinations, which equates to roughly a four percent probability that given the option of only four names to choose from, the likelihood that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John would be chosen in that exact order versus let's say Mark, Matthew, John, and Luke, for example. But how do we calculate the odds that no other children named Alvin or Sally or Mary (or Mohammed) would be born in the congregation during that same time? I suppose it could be calculated, in theory--we'd have to find out how many families were in the congregation at that time, and of that number, calculate how many of them were of "child-bearing" age. Difficult, … [Read more...]